Yeshé Dé (late eighth to early ninth century) was the most prolific translator of sūtras into Tibetan. Altogether he is credited with the translation of more than one hundred sixty sūtra translations and more than one hundred additional translations, mostly on tantric topics. In spite of Yeshé Dé’s great importance for the propagation of Buddhism in Tibet during the imperial era, only a few biographical details about this figure are known. Later sources describe him as a student of the Indian teacher Padmasambhava, and he is also credited with teaching both sūtra and tantra widely to students of his own. He was also known as Nanam Yeshé Dé, from the Nanam (sna nam) clan.
In Buddhist literature, this is an epithet applied to buddhas, most often to Śākyamuni. The Sanskrit term generally means “possessing fortune,” but in specifically Buddhist contexts it implies that a buddha is in possession of six auspicious qualities (bhaga) associated with complete awakening. The Tibetan term—where bcom is said to refer to “subduing” the four māras, ldan to “possessing” the great qualities of buddhahood, and ’das to “going beyond” saṃsāra and nirvāṇa—possibly reflects the commentarial tradition where the Sanskrit bhagavat is interpreted, in addition, as “one who destroys the four māras.” This is achieved either by reading bhagavat as bhagnavat (“one who broke”), or by tracing the word bhaga to the root √bhañj (“to break”).
The desire for things that arises from experiencing sense objects as pleasant. First of the four bonds that bind the psychophysical body to cyclic existence. Also one of the ten nonvirtues.
Emptiness denotes the ultimate nature of reality, the total absence of inherent existence and self-identity with respect to all phenomena. According to this view, all things and events are devoid of any independent, intrinsic reality that constitutes their essence. Nothing can be said to exist independent of the complex network of factors that gives rise to its origination, nor are phenomena independent of the cognitive processes and mental constructs that make up the conventional framework within which their identity and existence are posited. When all levels of conceptualization dissolve and when all forms of dichotomizing tendencies are quelled through deliberate meditative deconstruction of conceptual elaborations, the ultimate nature of reality will finally become manifest. It is the first of the three gateways to liberation.
These are mistaking impermanence for permanence, mistaking suffering for happiness, mistaking impurity for purity, and mistaking the absence of a self for a self.
The Sanskrit term śrāvaka, and the Tibetan nyan thos, both derived from the verb “to hear,” are usually defined as “those who hear the teaching from the Buddha and make it heard to others.” Primarily this refers to those disciples of the Buddha who aspire to attain the state of an arhat seeking their own liberation and nirvāṇa. They are the practitioners of the first turning of the wheel of the Dharma on the four noble truths, who realize the suffering inherent in saṃsāra and focus on understanding that there is no independent self. By conquering afflicted mental states (kleśa), they liberate themselves, attaining first the stage of stream enterers at the path of seeing, followed by the stage of once-returners who will be reborn only one more time, and then the stage of non-returners who will no longer be reborn into the desire realm. The final goal is to become an arhat. These four stages are also known as the “four results of spiritual practice.”
One of the ten nonvirtuous actions.
A summary or synopsis in verse form comprising a list of topics or keywords. One of several types of summary (uddāna) characteristic of the vinaya and abhidharma literature and also found in longer sūtras of the Dīrghāgama and (less often) Madhyamāgama. An intervening summary, found less often than the other types, typically summarizes the subject matter of a topical subsection of which it may also mark the end. See also n.3.
Jinamitra was invited to Tibet during the reign of King Tri Songdetsen (khri srong lde btsan, r. 742–98 ᴄᴇ) and was involved with the translation of nearly two hundred texts, continuing into the reign of King Ralpachen (ral pa can, r. 815–38 ᴄᴇ). He was one of the small group of paṇḍitas responsible for the Mahāvyutpatti Sanskrit–Tibetan dictionary.
The view that there is no inherently existent self, whether dependent on or independent of the five aggregates.
The corpus of texts known as the Mahāsūtras or “Great Discourses” comprises (at least in the Kangyur) ten works originally extracted from the Āgamas of the Sarvāstivādins and the Mūlasarvāstivādins with applications mentioned in the vinaya literature. See i.3 and the 84000 Knowledge Base article Mahāsūtras.
The hostility that arises from experiencing sense objects as unpleasant. The second of the four bonds that bind the psychophysical body to cyclic existence. Also one of the ten nonvirtues.
Māra, literally “death” or “maker of death,” is the name of the deva who tried to prevent the Buddha from achieving awakening, the name given to the class of beings he leads, and also an impersonal term for the destructive forces that keep beings imprisoned in saṃsāra:
(1) As a deva, Māra is said to be the principal deity in the Heaven of Making Use of Others’ Emanations (paranirmitavaśavartin), the highest paradise in the desire realm. He famously attempted to prevent the Buddha’s awakening under the Bodhi tree—see The Play in Full (Toh 95), 21.1—and later sought many times to thwart the Buddha’s activity. In the sūtras, he often also creates obstacles to the progress of śrāvakas and bodhisattvas. (2) The devas ruled over by Māra are collectively called mārakāyika or mārakāyikadevatā, the “deities of Māra’s family or class.” In general, these māras too do not wish any being to escape from saṃsāra, but can also change their ways and even end up developing faith in the Buddha, as exemplified by Sārthavāha; see The Play in Full (Toh 95), 21.14 and 21.43. (3) The term māra can also be understood as personifying four defects that prevent awakening, called (i) the divine māra (devaputramāra), which is the distraction of pleasures; (ii) the māra of Death (mṛtyumāra), which is having one’s life interrupted; (iii) the māra of the aggregates (skandhamāra), which is identifying with the five aggregates; and (iv) the māra of the afflictions (kleśamāra), which is being under the sway of the negative emotions of desire, hatred, and ignorance.
The term bhikṣu, often translated as “monk,” refers to the highest among the eight types of prātimokṣa vows that make one part of the Buddhist assembly. The Sanskrit term literally means “beggar” or “mendicant,” referring to the fact that Buddhist monks and nuns—like other ascetics of the time—subsisted on alms (bhikṣā) begged from the laity.
In the Tibetan tradition, which follows the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya, a monk follows 253 rules as part of his moral discipline. A nun (bhikṣuṇī; dge slong ma) follows 364 rules. A novice monk (śrāmaṇera; dge tshul) or nun (śrāmaṇerikā; dge tshul ma) follows thirty-six rules of moral discipline (although in other vinaya traditions novices typically follow only ten).
Indian scholar and translator of the sūtra. He lived during the eighth century and came to Tibet on the invitation of King Trisong Detsen. He contributed to the translation of 77 Buddhist works from Sanskrit into Tibetan during his stay in Tibet.
One of the first Buddhist monasteries, located in a park outside Śrāvastī, the capital of the ancient kingdom of Kośala in northern India. This park was originally owned by Prince Jeta, hence the name Jetavana, meaning Jeta’s grove. The wealthy merchant Anāthapiṇḍada, wishing to offer it to the Buddha, sought to buy it from him, but the prince, not wishing to sell, said he would only do so if Anāthapiṇḍada covered the entire property with gold coins. Anāthapiṇḍada agreed, and managed to cover all of the park except the entrance, hence the name Anāthapiṇḍadasyārāmaḥ, meaning Anāthapiṇḍada’s park. The place is usually referred to in the sūtras as “Jetavana, Anāthapiṇḍada’s park,” and according to the Saṃghabhedavastu the Buddha used Prince Jeta’s name in first place because that was Prince Jeta’s own unspoken wish while Anāthapiṇḍada was offering the park. Inspired by the occasion and the Buddha’s use of his name, Prince Jeta then offered the rest of the property and had an entrance gate built. The Buddha specifically instructed those who recite the sūtras to use Prince Jeta’s name in first place to commemorate the mutual effort of both benefactors.
Anāthapiṇḍada built residences for the monks, to house them during the monsoon season, thus creating the first Buddhist monastery. It was one of the Buddha’s main residences, where he spent around nineteen rainy season retreats, and it was therefore the setting for many of the Buddha’s discourses and events. According to the travel accounts of Chinese monks, it was still in use as a Buddhist monastery in the early fifth century ᴄᴇ, but by the sixth century it had been reduced to ruins.
A set of four bonds that bind the psychophysical body (Skt. kāya, Tib. tshogs) to cyclic existence. See also n.17
Considering discipline and the observance of vows as supreme is the third of the four bonds that bind the psychophysical body to cyclic existence.
A common two-member compound (dvandva) found as a stock phrase in Buddhist literature to refer broadly to two distinct systems of spiritual orientation and practice in early India. The term “śramaṇa” (Tib. dge sbyong) refers to those who took vows in non-brahmanical spiritual systems that focused on asceticism, renunciation, and monasticism. The term “brāhmaṇa” (Tib. bram ze) refers in this context not so much to brahmans in terms of caste identity alone but rather to those who actively participated in the Vedic tradition of learning and the ritual worship of brahmanical deities, mostly within the context of a householder lifestyle.
During the life of the Buddha, Śrāvastī was the capital city of the powerful kingdom of Kośala, ruled by King Prasenajit, who became a follower and patron of the Buddha. It was also the hometown of Anāthapiṇḍada, the wealthy patron who first invited the Buddha there, and then offered him a park known as Jetavana, Prince Jeta’s Grove, which became one of the first Buddhist monasteries. The Buddha is said to have spent about twenty-five rainy seasons with his disciples in Śrāvastī, thus it is named as the setting of numerous events and teachings. It is located in present-day Uttar Pradesh in northern India.
The quality or condition of things as they really are, which cannot be conveyed in conceptual, dualistic terms.
The first of the four truths of the noble ones. The term “suffering” includes all essentially unsatisfactory experiences of life in cyclic existence, whether physical or mental. These comprise (1) the suffering of suffering, i.e., the physical sensations and mental experiences that are self-evident as suffering and toward which spontaneous feelings of aversion arise; (2) the suffering of change, i.e., all experiences that are normally recognized as pleasant and desirable, but which are nonetheless suffering in that persistent indulgence in these always results in changing attitudes of dissatisfaction and boredom; and (3) the suffering of the pervasive conditioning underlying the round of birth, aging, and death.
One of the three higher trainings, namely the trainings in superior discipline, superior contemplation (lit. “superior mind”), and superior wisdom.
One of the three higher trainings, namely the trainings in superior discipline, superior contemplation (lit. “superior mind”), and superior wisdom.
One of the three higher trainings, namely the trainings in superior discipline, superior contemplation (lit. “superior mind”), and superior wisdom.
One of the “four misconceptions” (Skt. caturviparyāya; Tib. phyin ci log bzhi).
One of the “four misconceptions” (Skt. caturviparyāya; Tib. phyin ci log bzhi).
One of the “four misconceptions” (Skt. caturviparyāya; Tib. phyin ci log bzhi).
One of the “four misconceptions” (Skt. caturviparyāya; Tib. phyin ci log bzhi).
Fourth of the four bonds that bind the psychophysical body to cyclic existence.
The Buddha, Dharma, and Saṅgha—the three objects of Buddhist refuge. In the Tibetan rendering, “the three rare and supreme ones.”
The quality or condition of things as they really are, which cannot be conveyed in conceptual, dualistic terms.
mdo chen po sgyu ma’i dra ba. Toh 288, Degé Kangyur vol. 71 (mdo sde, sha), folios 230.a–244.a.
mdo chen po sgyu ma’i dra ba. bka’ ’gyur (dpe bsdur ma) [Comparative Edition of the Kangyur], krung go’i bod rig pa zhib ’jug ste gnas kyi bka’ bstan dpe sdur khang (The Tibetan Tripitaka Collation Bureau of the China Tibetology Research Center). 108 volumes. Beijing: krung go’i bod rig pa dpe skrun khang (China Tibetology Publishing House), 2006–9, vol. 71, pp. 604–43.
mdo chen po sgyu ma’i dra ba. Stok Palace Kangyur vol. 64 (mdo sde, pa), folios 369.a–391.a.
rgyud kyi rgyal po chen po sgyu ’phrul dra ba zhes bya ba’i rgyud. Toh 466. Degé Kangyur (Sde dge par phud), vol. 83 (rgyud ’bum, ja). Edited by chos kyi ’byung gnas. Delhi: Delhi Karmapae Chodhey Gyalwae Sungrab Partun Khang, 1976–9, folios 94.a–134.a.
Guṇamati. rnam par bshad pa’i rigs pa’i bshad pa (Vyākhyāyuktiṭīkā). Toh 4069, Degé Tengyur vol. 239 (sems tsam, si), folios 139.b–301.a.
Vasubandhu. rnam par bshad pa’i rigs pa (Vyākhyāyukti). Toh 4061, Degé Tengyur vol. 238 (sems tsam, shi), folios 29.a–134.b.
Denkarma (pho brang stod thang ldan [/ lhan] dkar gyi chos ’gyur ro cog gi dkar chag). Toh 4364, Degé Tengyur vol. 206 (sna tshogs, jo), folios 294.b–310.a.
Phangthangma (dkar chag ’phang thang ma). Pe cin: mi rigs dpe skrun khang, 2003.
Chökyi Drakpa (chos kyi grags pa). “bka’ ’gyur gyi dkar chag gsal ba bkod pa chos kyi rnam grangs legs par rtogs byed ces bya ba bzhugs so.” gsung ’bum, vol. 2. Kulhan: Drikung Kagyu Institute, 1999.
Blackburn, Anne. “Looking for the Vinaya: Monastic Discipline in the Practical Canons of the Theravāda.” In Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 22, 2 (1999): 281–310.
Herrmann-Pfandt, Adelheid. Die lHan kar ma: ein früher Katalog der ins Tibetische übersetzten buddhistischen Texte. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2008.
Pema Kunsang, Erik, trans. Gateway to Knowledge. Vol. II. Hong Kong: Rangjung Yeshe Publications, 2000.
Sharygin, Gleb. “Māyājāla-sūtra: A Canonical Proto-Yogācāra Sūtra?” Journal of Indian Philosophy 52 (2024): 359–401.
Sharygin, Gleb. “Proto-Yogācāra elements in the Māyājāla-sūtra.” In Puṣpikā: Proceedings of the 13th International Indology Graduate Rsearch Symposium (forthcoming).
Skilling, Peter. ed. Mahāsūtras: Great Discourses of the Buddha. Vol. I. Bristol: The Pali Text Society, 2010.
Skilling, Peter. ed. Mahāsūtras: Great Discourses of the Buddha. Vol II. Bristol: The Pali Text Society, 2012.